Our energy dilemma: biggest loser – or clean winner?

After a well needed weeks break from activity, the reviews seem to be flowing through.  Attached is the review from Mary-Lou Considine at Ecos Magazine.

ecos book review

2 Responses to “Our energy dilemma: biggest loser – or clean winner?”


  1. 1 Arjan Wilkie

    While this review and the book itself rightly trumpet the (only)direction in which we need to steer our economy; both are short on the detailed policy initiatives that are required to commercialise emerging low- or zero-carbon technologies. In Australia we have plenty of good R&D, and we have a few punters willing to try new ideas when they are available “off the shelf”. The gap is the problem - how do we incentivise the commercialisation pathway through pilot scale, to demonstration scale and then full commercial deployment? RET won’t do that, more R&D funding wont do it either. The private-public model needs to be applied to this with agressive tax concessions, seed money, planning fast-tracking, and ongoing funding (in exchange for equity) for a sufficient period to bridge this gap. In most cases it is a 5 -10 year committment to bring R&D to the market in a commercial form. Globally the winners will be those nations that invest in this important transition phase; the Nokias, Toyotas, Vestas and so forth all enjoy this level of support and committment in their home countries. There is a list of specific Australian Technologies that are currently struggling with this gap and they need to be sheparded through it as quickly as possible. The low-carbon economy is a race, in the technology sense. Once a technology establishes itself in a niche, then it is hard to fill that niche with a competitor. Australia needs to fill as many of these niches as it can!

    I think Bens book is a pearler - its really good to see the Australian context in print; I think its the best book of its kind since The Weathermakers. What was particulalry refreshing was the use of new anecdotes (canadian diamonds), new corporate examples (nokia, toyota, honda), and a clearly imagined and articulated domestic future (Australia 2050). We need to imagine the future before we can plot the path to reaching it, and Ben has done a great job of doing exactly that.

  2. 2 Ben

    Thanks for the comment Arjan! I completely agree that the single biggest barrier to that low carbon future is the transition phase between idea and commercialisation. It is always difficult to overcome the long-horizon for returns in the market-place and I absolutely agree thats where the government with tax breaks and direct seed funding should come in - we have to remember that’s how much of Toyota/Honda success came about through government incentives.

Leave a Reply